Ownership disclosure: this is Cost Seg Smart's own market guide. Cost Seg Smart is evaluated under the same published rubric as every other firm — if another company scores higher, it ranks higher. How we compare →
commercialcostsegreviews.com

Commercial Cost Segregation Market Guide

Pricing, methodology, and provider comparison — by property type.
Edition: July 2026
Next data review: September 2026
Reference work · no ratings · no testimonials
Property type guide

Cost segregation for resorts

A resort spends most of its capital outside the guest rooms. Pools and water features, multiple food-and-beverage outlets, recreation systems, and elaborate landscaped grounds mean the site improvements and amenity equipment often rival or exceed the FF&E line. That amenity density is why resorts sit at the high end of hospitality reclassification, commonly 25–42%: the more of the guest experience that lives in 15-year land improvements and 5-year recreation equipment, the less of the basis is trapped in the 39-year shell.

At a glance
Modeled reclass range25–42%
Typical study fee (Cost Seg Smart)See pricing guide
Recovery periods captured5-, 7- and 15-year vs the 39-year shell
DeliveryEngineering-based; virtual or on-site depending on the provider
Choosing a provider for this asset class?
Top 5 providers for resorts →

1What reclassifies in a resorts

Cost segregation moves qualifying components out of the 39-year building shell into shorter recovery periods. In a resort the recurring short-life components are:

Resort — commonly reclassified components
ComponentRecovery periodAuthority carried (with caveat)
Guest-room & villa FF&E where owned5-yearPersonal property (Asset Class 57.0) across rooms, suites, and villas; reconcile to the ledger where villas are individually owned or in a rental program. Ownership structure, not key count alone, sets the countable base.
Pools, spas & decorative water features — mechanical systems5-yearPumps, heaters, filtration, and feature controls generally qualify as equipment; the basins, shells, and hardscape deck are 15-year land improvements or 39-year building. Separate the mechanical system from the constructed shell.
Multiple food-and-beverage kitchen suites5-yearCommercial kitchen equipment across several outlets is generally personal property; built-in hoods and connections may follow the building. Scales with the number of outlets, an item-by-item determination.
Recreation equipment — marina, golf, tennis, and fitness systems5-yearAmenity equipment may qualify as §1245 property where it functions as equipment rather than structure; associated paving and courts are typically 15-year land improvements. Present only for the amenities the resort actually operates.
Landscaping & site amenities15-yearLand improvements (Asset Class 00.3) covering hardscape, irrigation, walkways, and site lighting; general grading of the land itself is non-depreciable. The distinction between improvement and land is fact-specific.
Decorative & landscape lighting5-yearDecorative interior fixtures and certain landscape accent lighting may qualify; base building and parking-lot illumination stay longer-life. A fixture-level judgment.
The one thing to know about resorts: Resorts are amenity-heavy, so the study is driven as much by the grounds and recreation systems as by the rooms: pools and water features, multiple kitchens, marina or golf or court equipment, and extensive landscaped site work. Because so much of the guest experience is built into 15-year land improvements and 5-year equipment, the reclassified share tends to reach the top of the hospitality range, 25–42%.

2Typical results and what drives the spread

Across standardized resort configurations, the engine models an accelerated share of roughly 25–42%. Where villas or units sit in a mixed-ownership rental program, the countable FF&E and improvement base depends on who holds title to each element, which the study reconciles before settling the figure. These are modeled ranges, not a promise for any specific building — see by the numbers.

3By the numbers (original data)

The accelerated-% range on this page is an internal model range: generated by running Cost Seg Smart's commercial component engine across standardized resort configurations. It is not a summary of completed client studies, and it is not a prediction for your building. Actual results depend on the property's facts, documentation and your CPA's positions.

4What a study costs for this type

Study fees track building size, documentation quality and whether an on-site inspection is performed. See the pricing guide for current market bands; competitor fees are sourced there, not quoted in prose here.

5Provider comparison — the Top 5 for this asset class

Every provider below is scored on the same fixed rubric, weighting relevant resort evidence most heavily. Facts are drawn from each provider's public materials and dated.

ProviderScore*Relevant resort evidenceProfile
RE Cost Seg
Engineering-first · National (Houston, TX)

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
7.9
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.8/524%18.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.0/514%11.2
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options5.0/57%7.0
Audit-support terms5.0/58%8.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%79.0 → 7.9
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cost Seg Smart site owner
Engineering-first

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
7.8
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options4.0/57%5.6
Audit-support terms3.0/58%4.8
Turnaround transparency4.0/57%5.6
Total100%78.0 → 7.8
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Baker Tilly
National accounting/advisory · National (Chicago, IL)

Best for national on-site coverage
Most transparent turnaround
7.6
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%76.0 → 7.6
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Source Advisors
Engineering-first · National (Fort Worth, TX)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.3
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation5.0/524%24.0
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency2.0/510%4.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%73.0 → 7.3
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cherry Bekaert
Engineering-first · National (Richmond, VA; #1 Southeast)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.2
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.6/524%22.1
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.3/514%12.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.5/57%4.9
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%72.0 → 7.2
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →

Top 5 of 22 firms scored for resort. See every firm's full profile and per-type standing in the provider directory.

*Score is this site's published rubric output (0–10) for resort, weighting relevant property-type evidence most heavily (see how we compare) — click any score for its build-up. It is not a customer rating and no reviews are used. Cost Seg Smart is the site owner and is scored on the same rubric.

6Is it worth it — break-even

The present-value benefit generally clears a study fee well before basis reaches the seven-figure midpoint given the amenity density, and earlier still where bonus depreciation applies to the large 5- and 15-year lines. It is weakest where a near-term disposition triggers §1245 recapture on the recreation and FF&E equipment.

7Frequently asked questions

Why do resorts reclassify a larger share than typical hotels?

Because so much of a resort's capital sits outside the building — pools, water features, landscaped grounds, and recreation systems — which fall into 15-year land improvements and 5-year equipment rather than the 39-year shell. That amenity density is why the modeled band, 25–42%, runs above other hospitality types, subject to your property's facts.

Is the golf course or the landscaped grounds depreciable?

It depends on the element. Constructed improvements — irrigation, cart paths, hardscape, site lighting — are generally 15-year land improvements, while the raw land and general grading are non-depreciable. Course and grounds shaping requires care to separate the improvement from the land underneath it.

How are the pools and water features treated?

The mechanical systems — pumps, heaters, filtration, feature controls — generally qualify as 5-year equipment, while the basins, shells, and surrounding hardscape are 15-year land improvements or part of the 39-year building. The study separates the operating equipment from the constructed shell.

We have villas in a rental program — whose depreciation is it?

Only assets you own and depreciate can be reclassified on your return. In a mixed-ownership rental program the countable base depends on who holds title to each unit and its furnishings, so the study reconciles ownership before assigning any figure.

Does a resort's amenity equipment face recapture on sale?

Yes. Gain attributable to the reclassified §1245 recreation and FF&E equipment is generally recaptured as ordinary income when the property is sold, separate from the building's §1250 gain. That makes the strategy strongest for a longer hold and weaker where a sale is near.

Sources and authority consulted

Related guides

All property-type guides → · Pricing · How we compare

Cost Seg Smart, which operates this guide, publishes commercial studies and fees at costsegsmart.com and details its methodology and sample reports at commercialcostseg.com.